Cleric or not, the law treats all equally: Shanmugam
The recent court cases involving religious leaders show that everyone is treated equally under the law, said Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam yesterday.
"There is rule of law, and rule of law is that if the facts show that an offence has been made, regardless of who you are, action will be taken," he said during a dialogue on racial and religious harmony.
Mr Shanmugam was asked what lessons could be drawn from the case of the Islamic religious teacher who was fined $4,000 last week for making offensive remarks about Christians and Jews.
He was also asked about the City Harvest Church case, in which six church leaders were found guilty of misusing $24 million and using a further $26 million of church funds to cover their tracks.
Speaking to 180 young people from community and religious groups, and institutes of higher learning, Mr Shanmugam said that these cases show the rule of law is strong in Singapore.
STRONG RULE OF LAW
People must believe and understand that there is a law and it will apply to everyone, whether you're a minister... or ordinary citizen or pastor or imam.
LAW AND HOME AFFAIRS MINISTER K. SHANMUGAM
"People must believe and understand that there is a law and it will apply to everyone, whether you're a minister... or ordinary citizen or pastor or imam," he said.
During the two-hour dialogue at the OnePeople.sg headquarters in Toa Payoh, the young people grilled the minister on hot-button issues on religious harmony and racial identity. Some asked if Singaporeans could move beyond mere tolerance of differences to appreciating diversity.
Others asked whether contentious issues like allowing uniformed officers to wear the tudung at work should be discussed openly or behind closed doors.
On the case of the imam, who has apologised for his actions and returned home to India, Mr Shanmugam said that people in Singapore are free to practise and profess their faiths but may not run down any other religion.
Doing anything that will lead to violence against another faith is "an absolute no-no", he stressed.
Mr Shanmugam acknowledged that if the Government's actions had not been well explained, the Muslim community might have felt hard done by. But, this did not happen, as he took pains to meet many religious leaders to explain the Government's action and they, in turn, explained to their communities, he said.
As for the City Harvest case, Mr Shanmugam said it showed that "whether you are a man of religion or man of commerce, if you've done anything wrong vis-a-vis finances, action will be taken".
The six church leaders received jail terms of seven months to 3 1/2 years.
He made the point again later, when an undergraduate said that in recent months, "Singapore had a lot of religious trials like the City Harvest saga".
Mr Shanmugam corrected him, saying: "That wasn't a religious trial. That was a trial of religious leaders for financial misdeeds."
The dialogue was organised by the Roses of Peace youth group, whose volunteers regularly give out roses to the public to promote peace and interfaith harmony.
Sent from my iPhone